The Iraqi Prime minister wants to stop other countries to support extremists in Iraq. Why doesn't he speak about the aggressor itself, how many people the US army killed. The terrorists in Iraq are the US troops.
I recommend the Iran to go for sanctions against the US because of its illegal invasion in Irak. The UN had imposed sanctions on Irak for some reason some years ago which finally may have helped the US ambitions there. The invasion in Irak was also according the UN against the law, so the US should be punished.
It cannot be that only smaller states suffer from sanctions and that this instrument seems to be used to the advantage of the big against the small.
Sanctions against the US must be high enough to achieve the aim to make its troops leave Irak.
That means it should be in the range of hundreds of billion or even in the range of a trillion dollar or more.
It could be achieved for instance by tax on US products worldwide. This tax in return could be used to build up an international army which should be able to keep the strong from going anywhere against the law in future. By this the chance that smaller countries can develop in a way the US or Europe disagree with increases. Further the smaller ones can use their resources probably more independently.
Saturday, March 10, 2007
Friday, March 2, 2007
The NATO must have no business in Asia
For instance in Afgahnistan. The Asian countries should answer to the Nato aggression there and finish it.
The Nato was designed to be a defence union but now invades other countries. So the foundations of it are lies like many other things in the western world.
So Asian countries should keep this organisation outside its asea and then together with the right people of the UN, without America and Europe, think about the future of this country. This includes a possible chance of the Taliban. They are seen as extermist.
But what is seen as extremist by the mainstream is extremist in deviating from their interests and concepts.
Such people and their way of thinking and living may in reality be interesting. I think it is important to defend a R E A L variety of cultures against the mainstreams interest of a monoculture controlled by it, which would be a disaster for the world.
This includes many cultures or interest groups which are seen as extremist but when closer looking they are just different and even interesting though in some area we won't agree with it.
Thailand is an excellent example for a country which is not that powerful and big but which had
a cultural and historical development which made it superior to Europe and America is some aspects of life. For instance peole are happy there without having much money. Discrimination against several groups is much less than in the west and more. Conflictsolving is with many Thais easier than with Europeans...
I think many other countries also have because of their development aspects in their society which makes them unique, just different but interesting for a certain number of people and or even better than industrial countries. Globalisation would destroy this would destroy mankind's heritage of cultures which is the foundation in this area. Much can be derived from there. The mainstream doesn't want this, it wants to establish its artifical system which serves the interest of few, it is a cruel system organized from the top to the bottom behind a fascade of formal democracy and human rights which both don't work proper there.
And when I see the arrogance Europeans encounter Thais I am sure their only wish is to bring European madness to Thailand... and also to Afgahnistan!!!
The Nato has not that much troops in Afgahnistan it should not be difficult to counter these and kick them off. I think it is also not that difficult to find volonteers to fight there. They only need the right training, weapons and leadership support. That should be available in Asia. But you certainly know how to finish the mainstreams greed to subdue everything it can in Asia and hope you act.
The Nato was designed to be a defence union but now invades other countries. So the foundations of it are lies like many other things in the western world.
So Asian countries should keep this organisation outside its asea and then together with the right people of the UN, without America and Europe, think about the future of this country. This includes a possible chance of the Taliban. They are seen as extermist.
But what is seen as extremist by the mainstream is extremist in deviating from their interests and concepts.
Such people and their way of thinking and living may in reality be interesting. I think it is important to defend a R E A L variety of cultures against the mainstreams interest of a monoculture controlled by it, which would be a disaster for the world.
This includes many cultures or interest groups which are seen as extremist but when closer looking they are just different and even interesting though in some area we won't agree with it.
Thailand is an excellent example for a country which is not that powerful and big but which had
a cultural and historical development which made it superior to Europe and America is some aspects of life. For instance peole are happy there without having much money. Discrimination against several groups is much less than in the west and more. Conflictsolving is with many Thais easier than with Europeans...
I think many other countries also have because of their development aspects in their society which makes them unique, just different but interesting for a certain number of people and or even better than industrial countries. Globalisation would destroy this would destroy mankind's heritage of cultures which is the foundation in this area. Much can be derived from there. The mainstream doesn't want this, it wants to establish its artifical system which serves the interest of few, it is a cruel system organized from the top to the bottom behind a fascade of formal democracy and human rights which both don't work proper there.
And when I see the arrogance Europeans encounter Thais I am sure their only wish is to bring European madness to Thailand... and also to Afgahnistan!!!
The Nato has not that much troops in Afgahnistan it should not be difficult to counter these and kick them off. I think it is also not that difficult to find volonteers to fight there. They only need the right training, weapons and leadership support. That should be available in Asia. But you certainly know how to finish the mainstreams greed to subdue everything it can in Asia and hope you act.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)