Der Schmutz der Ausbeutung klebt in jedem Porsche
http://linkszeitung.de/content/view/170430/42/
Porsche zahlt seinen Arbeitern 5,77 Eurobrutto pro Stunde im Werk Leipzig.
Sozialisten, wenn ihr nur den sozialen Reparaturbetrieb fuer den Kapitalismus betreibt, werden kluge Konservative (Sarkosy) eure brauchbaren Ideen aufgreifen und umsetzen und euch so moeglicherweise ueberfluessig machen. In einem System zu leben was man eigentlich nicht will fuehrt oft langfirstig zur geistigen Anpassung zerstoert also viel was Sozialisten ausmacht. Eine Alternative ist den Sozialismus zu ueberarbeiten und wieder als Gesellschaftssystem anzubieten und sich fuer seine Einfuehrung in Laendern der Welt einzusetzen.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Monday, December 15, 2008
To advertise a new military alliance as I wrote in my last post could support a better infrastructure in research and production of weapons and could prevent the closure the institution I mentioned.
The world faces the threat of the dictatorship of the New World order.
I think about some Americans I met that they admire Hitler want to learn from him and avoid his mistakes. The US is trying now to press the world in a system as Hitler did to optimize its profit from the world and will succeed if there is no massive resistance.
A new military alliance is needed. The key for Russia is to win new strong partners but also the smaller ones are welcome.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1174.htm
The world faces the threat of the dictatorship of the New World order.
I think about some Americans I met that they admire Hitler want to learn from him and avoid his mistakes. The US is trying now to press the world in a system as Hitler did to optimize its profit from the world and will succeed if there is no massive resistance.
A new military alliance is needed. The key for Russia is to win new strong partners but also the smaller ones are welcome.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1174.htm
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Russia surrenders to the NATO!?
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/12-12-2008/106826-russia_nato-0
about Russia's airspace.
I hope the decision to close the academy will be reviewed.
It would deliver the world finally to the dictatorship of the US and Europe, and these are nasty dictatorships I experience it every day by Mind Control terror but I know a lot which point at this. But also just to decide to have a different economy or politics than the west will become difficult
The US is ready for one of the greatest disasters for mankind. Its dictatorship.
There should be another military alliance to defend the freedom of its members to do its own politics also such which is considerably different than in the west.
Russia could head such an alliance. For this the academy in the article mentioned is needed.
A new alliance must be advertised.
Russia could make the following offer to Obama. No we do not open new military bases in foreign countries, if you start to reduce considerably yours. If not we will start.
Be aware. I read in two sources that by the year 2025 there will be wars for drinking water.
This means the US with its huge army and the best technology will go to other countries steel your water, drink it, put it in its car coolers while you die of thirst.
To beat this follow an alliance. To join the NATO is no choice because the US lies to its members and cheats them as well. One with Russia is my idea. They are currently the country with the best military technology outside the NATO.
I could be a little something like a motor for this. I have no education or experience in thsi area, but to push ahead the idea I could contribute to. Also in the long run to unveil more dangers coming from the west which makes such an alliance necessary I could contribute to.
About this should be spoken openly if people in responsibility are interested in this.
I need something in return . I am a target of hidden harassment and Mind control which follows me where I go. I need protection against this. I do not expect much help in the west. This week I have discovered a new suspect." surveysavy", a company which does surveys in the US is probably in MC. Other signs let me conclude that many others enjoy my abuse abuse in the US but also in Germany. This means human rights in these countries are hollow promises. This works only because this terror system is as sophisticated as the technology in general in the west.
Thais are not different from Americans in this as well. Many like sexual abuse. Partly a disgusting sort of people.
One idea I have that in Vietnam who are also not that western would not support this terror like Thailand does this all over the country. But because the terror comes from the US, Germany they need someone in the back like Russia to offer this. I would do some work to support to support a military alliance or media against the west. I am disabled so this service would be restricted.
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/12-12-2008/106826-russia_nato-0
about Russia's airspace.
I hope the decision to close the academy will be reviewed.
It would deliver the world finally to the dictatorship of the US and Europe, and these are nasty dictatorships I experience it every day by Mind Control terror but I know a lot which point at this. But also just to decide to have a different economy or politics than the west will become difficult
The US is ready for one of the greatest disasters for mankind. Its dictatorship.
There should be another military alliance to defend the freedom of its members to do its own politics also such which is considerably different than in the west.
Russia could head such an alliance. For this the academy in the article mentioned is needed.
A new alliance must be advertised.
Russia could make the following offer to Obama. No we do not open new military bases in foreign countries, if you start to reduce considerably yours. If not we will start.
Be aware. I read in two sources that by the year 2025 there will be wars for drinking water.
This means the US with its huge army and the best technology will go to other countries steel your water, drink it, put it in its car coolers while you die of thirst.
To beat this follow an alliance. To join the NATO is no choice because the US lies to its members and cheats them as well. One with Russia is my idea. They are currently the country with the best military technology outside the NATO.
I could be a little something like a motor for this. I have no education or experience in thsi area, but to push ahead the idea I could contribute to. Also in the long run to unveil more dangers coming from the west which makes such an alliance necessary I could contribute to.
About this should be spoken openly if people in responsibility are interested in this.
I need something in return . I am a target of hidden harassment and Mind control which follows me where I go. I need protection against this. I do not expect much help in the west. This week I have discovered a new suspect." surveysavy", a company which does surveys in the US is probably in MC. Other signs let me conclude that many others enjoy my abuse abuse in the US but also in Germany. This means human rights in these countries are hollow promises. This works only because this terror system is as sophisticated as the technology in general in the west.
Thais are not different from Americans in this as well. Many like sexual abuse. Partly a disgusting sort of people.
One idea I have that in Vietnam who are also not that western would not support this terror like Thailand does this all over the country. But because the terror comes from the US, Germany they need someone in the back like Russia to offer this. I would do some work to support to support a military alliance or media against the west. I am disabled so this service would be restricted.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
To my personal opinion leads the parliamentary democracy to a fascism of a worse or even worst sort.
Political parties are designed to fight for power in the illusion that by this the best politics would be the result. Actually the result is endless greed of power of this parties. Through the endless fights of parties for power they get perfect in doing this, that perfect that many people can no more recognize the real aims which lead parties. The get that perfect organized and perfect in control of society that a legal way against them will hardly be possible. An illegal won't be possible as well, as controlling of citizens achieves new levels so that revolution can hardly take place.
I amnot sure if this system does not reproduce old power structures and just looks different. It seems to be suitable to serve this purpose.
It looks like the parliamentary democracy leads to the despotism.
That is why I advise against parliamentary democracy. Democracy has to be defined new.I have no really well developed alternative to the current system just some points.
For Thailand this means, a team should be set up by the military and the supreme court to select suitable people for every government post. Belonging to a party should be no point.
What skills these people should have you probably know I want to remind that integrity is an important point, if you get negligent in this you may up with a mafia style government after some time, which hides brilliantly behind lies so that many people not even will recognize this. they only get to feel the consequences and the powerlessness because you don't know what to do about it.
Upholding Thai culture as it was and develop it accordingly to it in the face of technology and globalisation is a decisive point what these people should be willing to do. They should not allow that a foreign system is pressed in the country as this is already is happening.
I think it is important to set up a committee to develop Thailand's own independent political economy. You do not need a lot of scientists for this. Experienced and successful entrepreneurs, good Buddhist monks and others of society can help doing that, but it will take time and and needs developing after this. If you do this you have the chance to develop an economy which is fits in Thai culture. If not economy will destroy your culture. Greed is built up in capitalism longing and wishes are induced systematically. to fullfil the wishes for that you have to work hard. Products are often kept imperfect to keep people longing. A whole branch of psychology is behind advertising to stimulate the mentioned above. If you do the work and define your culture and get ready to defend it to recognize intruders and eliminate them or decide to accept this or that change you can keep a lot of chit which is sold as great out of your country.
When it comes to democracy I think when the leaders are bound to strive for harmony and to listen seriously to the people (or find themselves in trouble) you may have more from that than from some elections after which the winner just presses through his agenda. That does not replace elections but I see the necessity to review this point as I recognize there quite some problems which seriously question elections in the common form as a functioning tool of democracy.
Political parties are designed to fight for power in the illusion that by this the best politics would be the result. Actually the result is endless greed of power of this parties. Through the endless fights of parties for power they get perfect in doing this, that perfect that many people can no more recognize the real aims which lead parties. The get that perfect organized and perfect in control of society that a legal way against them will hardly be possible. An illegal won't be possible as well, as controlling of citizens achieves new levels so that revolution can hardly take place.
I amnot sure if this system does not reproduce old power structures and just looks different. It seems to be suitable to serve this purpose.
It looks like the parliamentary democracy leads to the despotism.
That is why I advise against parliamentary democracy. Democracy has to be defined new.I have no really well developed alternative to the current system just some points.
For Thailand this means, a team should be set up by the military and the supreme court to select suitable people for every government post. Belonging to a party should be no point.
What skills these people should have you probably know I want to remind that integrity is an important point, if you get negligent in this you may up with a mafia style government after some time, which hides brilliantly behind lies so that many people not even will recognize this. they only get to feel the consequences and the powerlessness because you don't know what to do about it.
Upholding Thai culture as it was and develop it accordingly to it in the face of technology and globalisation is a decisive point what these people should be willing to do. They should not allow that a foreign system is pressed in the country as this is already is happening.
I think it is important to set up a committee to develop Thailand's own independent political economy. You do not need a lot of scientists for this. Experienced and successful entrepreneurs, good Buddhist monks and others of society can help doing that, but it will take time and and needs developing after this. If you do this you have the chance to develop an economy which is fits in Thai culture. If not economy will destroy your culture. Greed is built up in capitalism longing and wishes are induced systematically. to fullfil the wishes for that you have to work hard. Products are often kept imperfect to keep people longing. A whole branch of psychology is behind advertising to stimulate the mentioned above. If you do the work and define your culture and get ready to defend it to recognize intruders and eliminate them or decide to accept this or that change you can keep a lot of chit which is sold as great out of your country.
When it comes to democracy I think when the leaders are bound to strive for harmony and to listen seriously to the people (or find themselves in trouble) you may have more from that than from some elections after which the winner just presses through his agenda. That does not replace elections but I see the necessity to review this point as I recognize there quite some problems which seriously question elections in the common form as a functioning tool of democracy.
Friday, December 5, 2008
Hessenwahl
CDU oder SPD? Sie sind fuer folgende Politik verantwortlich.
Lafontaine:
Die Lage der Staatsfinanzen und die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung erforderten jetzt einen gesetzlichen Mindestlohn von 8,71 Euro wie in Frankreich einzuführen. Lafontaine: "Es muss endlich Schluss damit sein, dass sich die Unternehmen auf Kosten der Beschäftigten und der Steuerzahlerinnen und Steuerzahler gesund stoßen."
http://linkszeitung.de/content/view/170338/1/
CDU oder SPD? Sie sind fuer folgende Politik verantwortlich.
Lafontaine:
Die Lage der Staatsfinanzen und die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung erforderten jetzt einen gesetzlichen Mindestlohn von 8,71 Euro wie in Frankreich einzuführen. Lafontaine: "Es muss endlich Schluss damit sein, dass sich die Unternehmen auf Kosten der Beschäftigten und der Steuerzahlerinnen und Steuerzahler gesund stoßen."
http://linkszeitung.de/content/view/170338/1/
Sunday, November 30, 2008
One thing which can be better in Thailand than in many countries of the west is the control of the government. The biggest party of the country got dissolved Thaksin was sentenced to prison. I read it also sometimes that other officials were brought to court. In. I recommend to preserve this and develop it in every area of society. Necessary steps must be taken that may be outside the government.
Power hungry political parties will rather use such legislation to their advantage than improve it. Look how it is in America.. People go to prison for smoking marijuana while manager at the FDA can make money with getting money from drug industry for wrong behavior.
http://www.naturalnews.com/024910.html
This is not the only area. For instance Electronic harassment is punished by law only in few states. Like Massachusetts. But there offenders only have to pay a fine. which may be high. This means the poor people may be deterred by this law but the rich not.
In Germany it is like this that one politician from the socialists said that abuse of office is quite common.
I think it is important to develop Thailand with respect to their culture and history. American led mainstream and Europe will not really accept that and try to push you in its desired shape.
It is important to take out of government people who are selling out Thai culture to money interests or the particularly mad concepts of globalization or else.
This possibility should be created. It has to happen probably against the government.
Further I see that in a parliamentary democracy the leading parties try to seize total power. To counter this it should be made that the government cannot change the constitution. A independent team of people not connected to parties and not selected by parties should be set up for this
There could be a tern of 8 years to reform it regularly to have a means to react on developments.
Further the police should be independent.. Top officials there should not be selected by the government as they will serve then their agenda.
A nationwide committee to uphold culture could be set up to monitor changes and propose rollbacks if they are against the culture. The power to enforce such rollbacks should be installed. To this committee should also belong a lot of people who think about developing Thailand in harmony with their culture.
I read that happiness was going down. Western people come to Thailand and are amazed how Thais can be happy with that little money and possessions. They are often not that happy.
You will loose your happiness when you only copy the west.
To defend your identity against American led mainstream you must get knowledgeable and additionally as hard as Al Quaida. Otherwise you will not achieve your goal.
Power hungry political parties will rather use such legislation to their advantage than improve it. Look how it is in America.. People go to prison for smoking marijuana while manager at the FDA can make money with getting money from drug industry for wrong behavior.
http://www.naturalnews.com/024910.html
This is not the only area. For instance Electronic harassment is punished by law only in few states. Like Massachusetts. But there offenders only have to pay a fine. which may be high. This means the poor people may be deterred by this law but the rich not.
In Germany it is like this that one politician from the socialists said that abuse of office is quite common.
I think it is important to develop Thailand with respect to their culture and history. American led mainstream and Europe will not really accept that and try to push you in its desired shape.
It is important to take out of government people who are selling out Thai culture to money interests or the particularly mad concepts of globalization or else.
This possibility should be created. It has to happen probably against the government.
Further I see that in a parliamentary democracy the leading parties try to seize total power. To counter this it should be made that the government cannot change the constitution. A independent team of people not connected to parties and not selected by parties should be set up for this
There could be a tern of 8 years to reform it regularly to have a means to react on developments.
Further the police should be independent.. Top officials there should not be selected by the government as they will serve then their agenda.
A nationwide committee to uphold culture could be set up to monitor changes and propose rollbacks if they are against the culture. The power to enforce such rollbacks should be installed. To this committee should also belong a lot of people who think about developing Thailand in harmony with their culture.
I read that happiness was going down. Western people come to Thailand and are amazed how Thais can be happy with that little money and possessions. They are often not that happy.
You will loose your happiness when you only copy the west.
To defend your identity against American led mainstream you must get knowledgeable and additionally as hard as Al Quaida. Otherwise you will not achieve your goal.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/BKA-Gesetz
Dahin fuehrt eine parlamentarische Demokratie. Wenn sich zwei grosse Parteien ziemlich sicher sein loennen das zumindest eine von ihnen die Regierung fuehrt, erinnern sie sich das sie gemeinsame Interessen haben. Die Macht, auch die Macht ueber den Buerger. Dieser Gesetzesentwurf ist ein Ausdruck davon. Es ist ein Ausdruck der Schwaeche dieser Regierungsform.
Ich denke das Demokratie und die Verfassung geschuetzt werden muessen. Vor einigen Jahrzehnten ging man mit dem Radikalenerlass gegen Kommunisten in oeffentlichen Aemtern vor.
Dann muss man auf der anderen politischen Seite auch so konsequent sein.
Fuer mich ist Wolfgang Schaeuble rechtsextrem und muss aus seinem Amt entfernt werden. Desweitteren muessen Untersuchungen wegen moeglichem Amtsmissbrauch stattfinden. Dieser Gesetzesentwurf kann schon als Grundlage dafuer dienen. Dann muessen Untersuchungen gegen die CDU und SPD stattfinden wegen rechtsextremer Stroemungen weil sie dieses stuetzen.
Zur Not muessen sie verboten werden. Thailand hat einmal die groesste Partei seines Landes verboten es leider versaeumt bei dieser Linie zu bleiben.
Vieleicht koennte man auch medizinische Untersuchungen gegen die Hauptbetreiber einleiten um sie auf "Schnueffelwahnsinn" untersuchen zu lassen.
Wenn das Gesetz jetzt nur intern gekippt wird setzt sich moeglicherweise auf Dauer eine rechtsextreme Linie zunaechst in den grossen Parteien und dann in Deutschland durch. SPD und CDU werden naemlich nach einiger Zeit nachsetzen um ihre Ziele zu erreichen, und die Menschen sind ihre Grundrechte fuer die Interessen "der Grossen" los.
Dahin fuehrt eine parlamentarische Demokratie. Wenn sich zwei grosse Parteien ziemlich sicher sein loennen das zumindest eine von ihnen die Regierung fuehrt, erinnern sie sich das sie gemeinsame Interessen haben. Die Macht, auch die Macht ueber den Buerger. Dieser Gesetzesentwurf ist ein Ausdruck davon. Es ist ein Ausdruck der Schwaeche dieser Regierungsform.
Ich denke das Demokratie und die Verfassung geschuetzt werden muessen. Vor einigen Jahrzehnten ging man mit dem Radikalenerlass gegen Kommunisten in oeffentlichen Aemtern vor.
Dann muss man auf der anderen politischen Seite auch so konsequent sein.
Fuer mich ist Wolfgang Schaeuble rechtsextrem und muss aus seinem Amt entfernt werden. Desweitteren muessen Untersuchungen wegen moeglichem Amtsmissbrauch stattfinden. Dieser Gesetzesentwurf kann schon als Grundlage dafuer dienen. Dann muessen Untersuchungen gegen die CDU und SPD stattfinden wegen rechtsextremer Stroemungen weil sie dieses stuetzen.
Zur Not muessen sie verboten werden. Thailand hat einmal die groesste Partei seines Landes verboten es leider versaeumt bei dieser Linie zu bleiben.
Vieleicht koennte man auch medizinische Untersuchungen gegen die Hauptbetreiber einleiten um sie auf "Schnueffelwahnsinn" untersuchen zu lassen.
Wenn das Gesetz jetzt nur intern gekippt wird setzt sich moeglicherweise auf Dauer eine rechtsextreme Linie zunaechst in den grossen Parteien und dann in Deutschland durch. SPD und CDU werden naemlich nach einiger Zeit nachsetzen um ihre Ziele zu erreichen, und die Menschen sind ihre Grundrechte fuer die Interessen "der Grossen" los.
Friday, November 21, 2008
Afghan article says US Bin-Ladin hunt phoney
http://www.juancole.com/2008/11/afghan-article-says-us-bin-ladin-hunt.html
I was told by another American that also Bill Clinton refused to get Bin Laden from an African government during his presidency.
http://www.juancole.com/2008/11/afghan-article-says-us-bin-ladin-hunt.html
I was told by another American that also Bill Clinton refused to get Bin Laden from an African government during his presidency.
Thursday, November 13, 2008
USA openly plays sly games with Russian missiles
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/13-11-2008/106697-missile_games-0
Gates shows that lying and tricking are permanent actions by the
Government of the United States
that is so to say American Standard.
Gates shows that there is no American interest to live peacefully with Russia and the people in the West have to mind the mainstream media propaganda machinery when it sets up attacks on Russia to support a hard line against it.
We will see if Obama changes the politics towards Russia but even if the next "Russenfresser" (German, a man who loves to eat Russians) in the repuplican party is probably already considering his bid for the White House in 2012.
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/13-11-2008/106697-missile_games-0
Gates shows that lying and tricking are permanent actions by the
Government of the United States
that is so to say American Standard.
Gates shows that there is no American interest to live peacefully with Russia and the people in the West have to mind the mainstream media propaganda machinery when it sets up attacks on Russia to support a hard line against it.
We will see if Obama changes the politics towards Russia but even if the next "Russenfresser" (German, a man who loves to eat Russians) in the repuplican party is probably already considering his bid for the White House in 2012.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
US election - some lessons for Thailand?
http://www.bangkokpost.com/061108_News/06Nov2008_news01.php
US election - some lessons for Thailand?
That would mean to overtake the American system.
You should develop your own as I see the American and European system with considerable weaknesses.
A man in charge of power and being integer and serious to make politics for all people and being serious about striving for harmony is always superior to a man who won an election and then just puts through what he and his party wants.
The second man and mostly disregards protests He will say in the next election you have a chance. But then another big party wins (there are usually only two big ones) and again does politics go against your interests and ideals. After some time people who do not agree with the big parties become minorities and get pressed in the way the two big parties think. That is western democracy. More crazy than democratic. Apart from this the system will eliminate Thai culture, which is in some parts superior to western countries. I know Thais are often too stupid to recognize this and look to America.
YOU STUPID. Do it yourself and ignore America!
America wants to rule the world or make the world like it is, but that does not mean that they have the best solutions. They are just the strongest and want it.
http://www.bangkokpost.com/061108_News/06Nov2008_news01.php
US election - some lessons for Thailand?
That would mean to overtake the American system.
You should develop your own as I see the American and European system with considerable weaknesses.
A man in charge of power and being integer and serious to make politics for all people and being serious about striving for harmony is always superior to a man who won an election and then just puts through what he and his party wants.
The second man and mostly disregards protests He will say in the next election you have a chance. But then another big party wins (there are usually only two big ones) and again does politics go against your interests and ideals. After some time people who do not agree with the big parties become minorities and get pressed in the way the two big parties think. That is western democracy. More crazy than democratic. Apart from this the system will eliminate Thai culture, which is in some parts superior to western countries. I know Thais are often too stupid to recognize this and look to America.
YOU STUPID. Do it yourself and ignore America!
America wants to rule the world or make the world like it is, but that does not mean that they have the best solutions. They are just the strongest and want it.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Genscher plädiert für »neue Weltordnung«
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/137967.genscher-plaediert-fuer-neue-weltordnung.html?sstr=Genscher
...Genscher distanzierte sich von der Vorstellung einer »unipolaren« globalen Ordnung. Es sei »eine gefährliche Illusion« zu glauben, »ein Land könne Kraft seiner militärischen und wirtschaftlichen Stärke die globalen Regeln nach eigenem Ermessen bestimmen, ohne ihnen selbst unterworfen zu sein.« ..
Liest sich als ob die USA die Laender der Welt wie Huehner in eine Legebatterie stecken will,
sich selbst natuerlich nicht, sie will den Betreiber spielen.
Wenn man die militaerische Staerke der USA betrachtet dann sieht es nach einer Verteidigungsunfaehigkeit der meisten Laender der Welt (die EU vieleicht ausgenommen)
gegenueber der USA aus, genauso wie Huehner es gegenueber Menschen sind.
Und diese Laender werden dann auch genau so behandelt.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/137971.usa-raketenabwehr-moskau-hat-allen-grund-beunruhigt-zu-sein.html?sstr=raketenabwehr
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm
Das einzige was dagegen hilft sind nicht Appelle, Gesetze, Proteste, nein nur die richtigen Waffen. Vieleicht sind wirtschaftliche Druckmittel moeglich. Aber dort sieht es meist auch ungekehrt aus.
Vieleicht laesst sich dennoch die Finanzkrise nutzen um die gefaehrliche Bedrohung der Welt durch die USA abzubauen.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/137967.genscher-plaediert-fuer-neue-weltordnung.html?sstr=Genscher
...Genscher distanzierte sich von der Vorstellung einer »unipolaren« globalen Ordnung. Es sei »eine gefährliche Illusion« zu glauben, »ein Land könne Kraft seiner militärischen und wirtschaftlichen Stärke die globalen Regeln nach eigenem Ermessen bestimmen, ohne ihnen selbst unterworfen zu sein.« ..
Liest sich als ob die USA die Laender der Welt wie Huehner in eine Legebatterie stecken will,
sich selbst natuerlich nicht, sie will den Betreiber spielen.
Wenn man die militaerische Staerke der USA betrachtet dann sieht es nach einer Verteidigungsunfaehigkeit der meisten Laender der Welt (die EU vieleicht ausgenommen)
gegenueber der USA aus, genauso wie Huehner es gegenueber Menschen sind.
Und diese Laender werden dann auch genau so behandelt.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/137971.usa-raketenabwehr-moskau-hat-allen-grund-beunruhigt-zu-sein.html?sstr=raketenabwehr
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm
Das einzige was dagegen hilft sind nicht Appelle, Gesetze, Proteste, nein nur die richtigen Waffen. Vieleicht sind wirtschaftliche Druckmittel moeglich. Aber dort sieht es meist auch ungekehrt aus.
Vieleicht laesst sich dennoch die Finanzkrise nutzen um die gefaehrliche Bedrohung der Welt durch die USA abzubauen.
Something you again won't find easily in western media.
USA introduces more sanctions against Russia’s defense export enterprise
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/24-10-2008/106617-usa_russia_sanctions-0
The quality of western media is certainly not convincing.
USA introduces more sanctions against Russia’s defense export enterprise
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/24-10-2008/106617-usa_russia_sanctions-0
The quality of western media is certainly not convincing.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
André Brie (LINKE) warnt vor «falscher Partnerschaft»
http://linkszeitung.de/content/view/169870/45/
Die NATO ist ein gefaehrliches imperialistisches Kampfbuendnis das sich gegen wohlgemeinte Organisationen (UNO) richtet und damit seine Existenzberechtigung in Frage stellt.
Ich appeliere an asiatische Staaten dies zu sehen und militaerische Konsequenzen zu ziehen.
Ein Buendnis gegen die NATO gerichtet muesste her.
Der erste Auftrag eines solchen Buendnisses koennte sein eine amerikanisch-europische Loesung in Afghanistan zu verhindern.
http://linkszeitung.de/content/view/169870/45/
Die NATO ist ein gefaehrliches imperialistisches Kampfbuendnis das sich gegen wohlgemeinte Organisationen (UNO) richtet und damit seine Existenzberechtigung in Frage stellt.
Ich appeliere an asiatische Staaten dies zu sehen und militaerische Konsequenzen zu ziehen.
Ein Buendnis gegen die NATO gerichtet muesste her.
Der erste Auftrag eines solchen Buendnisses koennte sein eine amerikanisch-europische Loesung in Afghanistan zu verhindern.
Help Burma
http://www.bangkokpost.com/topstories/topstories.php?id=131640
I advise against western style democracy and capitalistc economy.
This democracy easily ends up in a cruel dictatorship of the majority and has shown to be an excellent system to support for instance capitalist exploitation and destruction of nature.
It brings about moral decline and decay of humanity. Every aspect of life becomes subject of industrial profitmaking which gets legalised by the governments.
The socialist system of Tito in the former Jugoslavia could be an instiration for Burma.
This would mean local and maybe regional selfadministration,which will help to improve the living conditions in Burma. I recommend it to work together with Cuba, Russia, Vietnam
http://www.bangkokpost.com/topstories/topstories.php?id=131640
I advise against western style democracy and capitalistc economy.
This democracy easily ends up in a cruel dictatorship of the majority and has shown to be an excellent system to support for instance capitalist exploitation and destruction of nature.
It brings about moral decline and decay of humanity. Every aspect of life becomes subject of industrial profitmaking which gets legalised by the governments.
The socialist system of Tito in the former Jugoslavia could be an instiration for Burma.
This would mean local and maybe regional selfadministration,which will help to improve the living conditions in Burma. I recommend it to work together with Cuba, Russia, Vietnam
Friday, October 24, 2008
In western media you hardly find such articles. They call their media free media.
It is not free and the people in the west are also not free.
Pakistan's Imminent Demise, Another DC Ideologue Screwup
http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/106613-0/
And this permanent messing about with other nations affairs of the US government should be finished. Ron Paul would. Obama and McCain won't.
So the people around the world have to finish it.
It is not free and the people in the west are also not free.
Pakistan's Imminent Demise, Another DC Ideologue Screwup
http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/106613-0/
And this permanent messing about with other nations affairs of the US government should be finished. Ron Paul would. Obama and McCain won't.
So the people around the world have to finish it.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
It looks like the FDA in America belongs to organised crime with the US government supporting it.
http://www.naturalnews.com/024567.html
If resistance against this in the US can change this is questionable. There are already quite some miserable laws in place.
McCain or Obama will rather be accomplice in this crimes than anything else.
Ron Paul would likely change this.
He is the one who would give America a real choice to stick with what it stood for in the time where the homeland of capitalism changes partly to socialism.
What about ordering him on the ballot by the supreme court of the US if he agrees with this.
Circumvent the regulations to create a real choice in the elections in the time of major changes in the country. Both other main candidates are not that far from each other in quite some essentials.
As you see the US is no more a model for the world. And with Obama and McCain it probably will walk partly in the wrong direction.
The people around the world should support independent politics in their countries.
http://www.naturalnews.com/024567.html
If resistance against this in the US can change this is questionable. There are already quite some miserable laws in place.
McCain or Obama will rather be accomplice in this crimes than anything else.
Ron Paul would likely change this.
He is the one who would give America a real choice to stick with what it stood for in the time where the homeland of capitalism changes partly to socialism.
What about ordering him on the ballot by the supreme court of the US if he agrees with this.
Circumvent the regulations to create a real choice in the elections in the time of major changes in the country. Both other main candidates are not that far from each other in quite some essentials.
As you see the US is no more a model for the world. And with Obama and McCain it probably will walk partly in the wrong direction.
The people around the world should support independent politics in their countries.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Ich denke nicht das es fuer die SPD einen Aufbruch in eine neue bessere Zeit geben darf.
Müntefering und Steinmeier beschwören Aufbruch in neue Zeit
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,584955,00.html
mein persoenlicher Spitzname fuer diese Fehlorganisation ist "Die Rote Pest".
Diese muss genauso ueberwunden werden wie es mit der Schwarzen Pest notwendig war.
Meiner Einschaetzung beinhaltet die Idologie dieser Organisation ein Welt-und Menschenbild welches elitezentriert von oben zu kontrolieren und zu steuern ist. Sie ist also ein Feind von Freiheit, Menschlichkeit und schlichtweg der einfachen Leute, was sie mit dem Einsatz fuer finanzielle Mittel fuer diese kaschiert. Das staendige Luegen kaschiert letztlich ihre wahren Ziele.
Gute Untersuchungen wuerden diese Organisation wohl als rechtsextrem hinstellen und die Notwendigkeit eines Verbots dieser herausstreichen. Aber diese Krake hat ueberall ihre Finger drin so auch in Universitaeten und so sind richtige Ermittlungen schwierig durchzufuehren auch wiel ihr Einfluss auf das Denken der Menschen nicht unerhelbich ist.
Ich sehe es so das die ueber lange Zeit herrschenden Parteien die Mittel zur Machtausuebung die Mehrheiten bei Wahlen ihnen beschafft hat, auch dazu benutzen um z.B verdeckt hinter anderen Motiven moegliche Gefahren fuer sich auszuschalten und die Demokratie auszuhebeln. Eine Korrektur dafuer fehlt auch weil nur wenige dieser Sache geistig hinterhergehen.
Wie waere es mit Untersuchungen gegen die Roten damit anzufangen.
Müntefering und Steinmeier beschwören Aufbruch in neue Zeit
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,584955,00.html
mein persoenlicher Spitzname fuer diese Fehlorganisation ist "Die Rote Pest".
Diese muss genauso ueberwunden werden wie es mit der Schwarzen Pest notwendig war.
Meiner Einschaetzung beinhaltet die Idologie dieser Organisation ein Welt-und Menschenbild welches elitezentriert von oben zu kontrolieren und zu steuern ist. Sie ist also ein Feind von Freiheit, Menschlichkeit und schlichtweg der einfachen Leute, was sie mit dem Einsatz fuer finanzielle Mittel fuer diese kaschiert. Das staendige Luegen kaschiert letztlich ihre wahren Ziele.
Gute Untersuchungen wuerden diese Organisation wohl als rechtsextrem hinstellen und die Notwendigkeit eines Verbots dieser herausstreichen. Aber diese Krake hat ueberall ihre Finger drin so auch in Universitaeten und so sind richtige Ermittlungen schwierig durchzufuehren auch wiel ihr Einfluss auf das Denken der Menschen nicht unerhelbich ist.
Ich sehe es so das die ueber lange Zeit herrschenden Parteien die Mittel zur Machtausuebung die Mehrheiten bei Wahlen ihnen beschafft hat, auch dazu benutzen um z.B verdeckt hinter anderen Motiven moegliche Gefahren fuer sich auszuschalten und die Demokratie auszuhebeln. Eine Korrektur dafuer fehlt auch weil nur wenige dieser Sache geistig hinterhergehen.
Wie waere es mit Untersuchungen gegen die Roten damit anzufangen.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
What about to use the US financial crisis against the US to weaken it without harming much others. With its superpower it dominats the world to its advantage. To try to finish this can bring about real freedom instead of the monoculture of political and economical American Standards.
But there must then be enough watching that these freedoms do not serve new despots.
But there must then be enough watching that these freedoms do not serve new despots.
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Walter Block: Barr-Root ‘arguably less libertarian’ than Sarah Palin
http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/walter-block-barr-root-arguably-less-libertarian-than-sarah-palin/
I cite out of it " ...given that war is the health of the state..."
This is how many Americans are.
I met an American in Cambodia who asked what I would think about using nuclear bombs on Pakistan. I met another one who answered on my question what to do to escape being a victim of MC that I should help him ponder about how to conquer Iran.
They are not peaceful not even responisbly acting, They are a threat to world peace and a human development. It is not only the government it is the people. When you see Americans you should give them to feel what you think about how they are, and nations should start to recognize this threat and develop answers.
http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/09/walter-block-barr-root-arguably-less-libertarian-than-sarah-palin/
I cite out of it " ...given that war is the health of the state..."
This is how many Americans are.
I met an American in Cambodia who asked what I would think about using nuclear bombs on Pakistan. I met another one who answered on my question what to do to escape being a victim of MC that I should help him ponder about how to conquer Iran.
They are not peaceful not even responisbly acting, They are a threat to world peace and a human development. It is not only the government it is the people. When you see Americans you should give them to feel what you think about how they are, and nations should start to recognize this threat and develop answers.
Friday, August 29, 2008
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/134612.baerendienst-fuer-die-eu.html
Politik in der EU im Dienste der Industrie auch gegen die Menschen!
Man koennte auch sagen Politik in der EU ist auf Mainstreamstandard oder macht Realpolitik.
Vieleicht sollten alle Spitzenpolitiker in der EU wie auch in den USA die gleiche Kleidung wie Formel I Stars tragen. Die Werbeplaketten der von ihnen gefoerderten Konzerne ueberall auf der Kleidung verteilt. Dann wuesste man auf Anhieb ueber sie Bescheid.
Ich denke das der Platz auf der Kleidung fuer die Aufkleber aber nicht ausreicht. Sie sind wahrscheinlich eher generell Eigentum des Grosskapitals.
Ich bin jetzt ueber funfzig Jahre und denke auf Grund meiner Erfahrung das sich das in der westlichen Welt wahrscheinlich nicht aendern wird. Nur die noch nicht Mainstreamstandard unterworfenen Laender haben vieleicht noch eine Chance davonzukommen. Jedes Land welches vom Westen kontrolliert wird oder mehr oder weniger dessen Werte uebernimmt, rennt in die gleiche Fehlentwicklung. Es sind aber viele Fehlentwicklungen in der westlichen Welt die sich wahrscheinlich nicht aendern lassen weil sie von den grossen etablierten politischen Kraeften zu deren Vorteil gewollt. Gleichzeitig sind imperialistische Kraefte im Westeb sehr stark, man haelt sich fuer den Nabel der Welt und versucht das System ueberallhin zu verbreiten. Ich befuerworte deshalb ein neues Militaerbundnis dem zum Beispiel diese Laender angehoeren koennten. suedamerikanische- afrikanische-asiatische-, arabische Laender, Russland, China, Indien vieleicht einige Laender Osteuropas oder auch andere. Dieses Militaerbuendnis soll die "westliche Wertediktatur"
verhindern und eine mehr freie Entwicklung dieser Laender foerdern. Sie uebernehmen westliche Werte oder auch nicht. Das ist in der westlichen Einflusszone nicht wirklich moeglich. Das heisst auch nicht in den Kapitalismus oder die parlamentarische Demokratie gepresst zu werden. Sozialistische oder aus der Tradition und Geschichte von Laendern hervorgegangene politische Systeme haben moeglicherweise das Potential positive Seiten zu beweisen die der westlichen Welt fremd sind.
Dieses Militaerbuendnis haette dann die Macht die Globalisierung zu beenden,
oder auf wesentlich weniger Aspekte zu reduzieren. Dies nicht zu tun hielte ich fuer eine Katastrophe.
Das Buendnis sollte nicht zum Schutzschild fuer Despoten werden und nach innen einiges tun um Werte, die auch unterschiedlich sein koennen je nach Kultur, durchzusetzen. Ueber Interventionen oder sonstige Massnahmen in Laendern sollten aber Menschen befinden die von deutlich hoeherer charakterlicher und geistiger Qualitaet sind als dies bei Topmainstreampolitiker ueblicherweise vorzufinden ist, sonst bleibt es bei kalter Interessenpolitik verdeckt mit viel Heuchelei ueber Werte. Zudem sind wirklich gute Leute viel eher in der Lage gangbare Wege mit sich widersetzenden Regimes zu finden um Werte zu erreichen.
Politik in der EU im Dienste der Industrie auch gegen die Menschen!
Man koennte auch sagen Politik in der EU ist auf Mainstreamstandard oder macht Realpolitik.
Vieleicht sollten alle Spitzenpolitiker in der EU wie auch in den USA die gleiche Kleidung wie Formel I Stars tragen. Die Werbeplaketten der von ihnen gefoerderten Konzerne ueberall auf der Kleidung verteilt. Dann wuesste man auf Anhieb ueber sie Bescheid.
Ich denke das der Platz auf der Kleidung fuer die Aufkleber aber nicht ausreicht. Sie sind wahrscheinlich eher generell Eigentum des Grosskapitals.
Ich bin jetzt ueber funfzig Jahre und denke auf Grund meiner Erfahrung das sich das in der westlichen Welt wahrscheinlich nicht aendern wird. Nur die noch nicht Mainstreamstandard unterworfenen Laender haben vieleicht noch eine Chance davonzukommen. Jedes Land welches vom Westen kontrolliert wird oder mehr oder weniger dessen Werte uebernimmt, rennt in die gleiche Fehlentwicklung. Es sind aber viele Fehlentwicklungen in der westlichen Welt die sich wahrscheinlich nicht aendern lassen weil sie von den grossen etablierten politischen Kraeften zu deren Vorteil gewollt. Gleichzeitig sind imperialistische Kraefte im Westeb sehr stark, man haelt sich fuer den Nabel der Welt und versucht das System ueberallhin zu verbreiten. Ich befuerworte deshalb ein neues Militaerbundnis dem zum Beispiel diese Laender angehoeren koennten. suedamerikanische- afrikanische-asiatische-, arabische Laender, Russland, China, Indien vieleicht einige Laender Osteuropas oder auch andere. Dieses Militaerbuendnis soll die "westliche Wertediktatur"
verhindern und eine mehr freie Entwicklung dieser Laender foerdern. Sie uebernehmen westliche Werte oder auch nicht. Das ist in der westlichen Einflusszone nicht wirklich moeglich. Das heisst auch nicht in den Kapitalismus oder die parlamentarische Demokratie gepresst zu werden. Sozialistische oder aus der Tradition und Geschichte von Laendern hervorgegangene politische Systeme haben moeglicherweise das Potential positive Seiten zu beweisen die der westlichen Welt fremd sind.
Dieses Militaerbuendnis haette dann die Macht die Globalisierung zu beenden,
oder auf wesentlich weniger Aspekte zu reduzieren. Dies nicht zu tun hielte ich fuer eine Katastrophe.
Das Buendnis sollte nicht zum Schutzschild fuer Despoten werden und nach innen einiges tun um Werte, die auch unterschiedlich sein koennen je nach Kultur, durchzusetzen. Ueber Interventionen oder sonstige Massnahmen in Laendern sollten aber Menschen befinden die von deutlich hoeherer charakterlicher und geistiger Qualitaet sind als dies bei Topmainstreampolitiker ueblicherweise vorzufinden ist, sonst bleibt es bei kalter Interessenpolitik verdeckt mit viel Heuchelei ueber Werte. Zudem sind wirklich gute Leute viel eher in der Lage gangbare Wege mit sich widersetzenden Regimes zu finden um Werte zu erreichen.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
What about protection for Iran from Russia and China? The mainstream must not conquer any land anymore as it becomes the base for further attacks on other not-mainstream controlled countries. Every country the mainstream conquers will be used to encircle you.
Your independence is already at stake with Iran. You should be ready to answer maybe with a nuclear shield. It is utmost difficult to fight the west but there is no choice. There is no choice.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/134096.die-armada-am-golf.html
There is some probability that the US will invade Iran now.
Your independence is already at stake with Iran. You should be ready to answer maybe with a nuclear shield. It is utmost difficult to fight the west but there is no choice. There is no choice.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/134096.die-armada-am-golf.html
There is some probability that the US will invade Iran now.
Sunday, August 17, 2008
I read about Russias imperialism about the danger Russia would pose.
SAY IT VERY CLEARLY THE MOST DANGEROUS AGGRESSOR IN THE WORLD IS THE USA.
What about accepting territorial integrity of Iraq and Afghanistan and withdraw troops from there. What about setting up pressure on the USA to do this like it is happening now against Russia? But double standards are often Western Standards, isn't it.
Isn't it important for instance to put up a missile defence shield and more against the USA, because they have invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, they brought their capitalist puppets in power there, maybe the next place they are bombing is your home. Protection against the USA is needed!
Or want you just brush aside about 90000 civilian deaths from violence
(www.iraqbodycount.org/database/)
caused by the US through their war in Iraq?
SAY IT VERY CLEARLY THE MOST DANGEROUS AGGRESSOR IN THE WORLD IS THE USA.
What about accepting territorial integrity of Iraq and Afghanistan and withdraw troops from there. What about setting up pressure on the USA to do this like it is happening now against Russia? But double standards are often Western Standards, isn't it.
Isn't it important for instance to put up a missile defence shield and more against the USA, because they have invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, they brought their capitalist puppets in power there, maybe the next place they are bombing is your home. Protection against the USA is needed!
Or want you just brush aside about 90000 civilian deaths from violence
(www.iraqbodycount.org/database/)
caused by the US through their war in Iraq?
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
To the conflict in Georgia.
I read that the president of Georgia is in power because of actions taken by the US. So the elections were stolen from the Georgian people. So dependent on the US he is bound to do politics for them, and this conflict now is one example of this.
In the back is a conflict about oil and the threat to loose it brought western corporations to create this war with its influence in politics.
When it is like this Russia should remove the current government in Georgia and set up new elections. A government serving the US instead of its people in Georgia will also in future be a troublemaker for Russia.
But another trouble maker is possibly coming up. If the western forces win the war in Afghanistan, this country will be built largely in the interest of the US and serve it.
Further when there are complaints about the territorial integrity of Georgia what about the integrity of Afghanistan and Iraq? The US is by far the most dangerous aggressor.
It toppled 14 governments the last decades. Among this democracies which were replaced by dictatorships because they served American interest better.
The conflict in Georgia was arranged by the US and serves it because of the Russian military actions some East European states turn more against Russia helping to suround it.
The whole politics of the US and its allies aims at at encircling and finally conquer Russia and make its particularly mad politics world standard.
Another hint for this that the new European treaty will bring about cuts in social expenses and increases in military budgets despite there is no real enemy and the EU is strong enough to defend against Russia.
Eefficient resistance against it could be to encourage and support Russia to build a new military alliance to counter the dangerous NATO. When you look inside the US you see that there the chances of successful resistance against mainstream politics are very limited.
This new military alliance offers the chance for another world order than the American one which will optimize its profits against the world and has a lot of disregard for many important things like Humanity, environment, freedom, the truth...
Support Russia's independence to fight the NWO, the New World Order. It may be your last chance to support your own freedom. Already the existence of not mainstream controlled countries will help this but certainly other things are necessary.
America will further cut individual freedoms and together with its already existing hidden surveillance and terror system and its large scale wrong developments in society will this bring a society which is not at all acceptable. As usual it will take its failures to other countries in the world and try to sell them as great. (like many pharmaceutical products)
Help to fight Americas imperialism now!!! Not when its too late.
I read that the president of Georgia is in power because of actions taken by the US. So the elections were stolen from the Georgian people. So dependent on the US he is bound to do politics for them, and this conflict now is one example of this.
In the back is a conflict about oil and the threat to loose it brought western corporations to create this war with its influence in politics.
When it is like this Russia should remove the current government in Georgia and set up new elections. A government serving the US instead of its people in Georgia will also in future be a troublemaker for Russia.
But another trouble maker is possibly coming up. If the western forces win the war in Afghanistan, this country will be built largely in the interest of the US and serve it.
Further when there are complaints about the territorial integrity of Georgia what about the integrity of Afghanistan and Iraq? The US is by far the most dangerous aggressor.
It toppled 14 governments the last decades. Among this democracies which were replaced by dictatorships because they served American interest better.
The conflict in Georgia was arranged by the US and serves it because of the Russian military actions some East European states turn more against Russia helping to suround it.
The whole politics of the US and its allies aims at at encircling and finally conquer Russia and make its particularly mad politics world standard.
Another hint for this that the new European treaty will bring about cuts in social expenses and increases in military budgets despite there is no real enemy and the EU is strong enough to defend against Russia.
Eefficient resistance against it could be to encourage and support Russia to build a new military alliance to counter the dangerous NATO. When you look inside the US you see that there the chances of successful resistance against mainstream politics are very limited.
This new military alliance offers the chance for another world order than the American one which will optimize its profits against the world and has a lot of disregard for many important things like Humanity, environment, freedom, the truth...
Support Russia's independence to fight the NWO, the New World Order. It may be your last chance to support your own freedom. Already the existence of not mainstream controlled countries will help this but certainly other things are necessary.
America will further cut individual freedoms and together with its already existing hidden surveillance and terror system and its large scale wrong developments in society will this bring a society which is not at all acceptable. As usual it will take its failures to other countries in the world and try to sell them as great. (like many pharmaceutical products)
Help to fight Americas imperialism now!!! Not when its too late.
Friday, August 8, 2008
Olympia in China
Cohn-Bendit zieht Nazi-Vergleich
http://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/olympia-in-china-cohn-bendit-zieht-nazi-vergleich_aid_323267.html
Die politische Linke in Deutschland ist geuebt im heucheln!
Deutschland hat ein ueber die ganze Republik verteiltes Netz von Personen die in kuerzester Zeit aktiviert werden koennen um eine ausgesuchte Person illegal zu schikanieren und illegal zu beschnueffeln. Es werden dann Ereignesse insziniert die wie zufaellig geschehen aussehen und die Betroffene Person permanent in Schwierigkeiten bringen. die Opfer sind normalerweise keine kriminellen die man anders nicht belangen kann. Der Terror geht permanent weiter wobei einzeln Ereignesse gar nicht so schlimm aussehen, aber sie sind haeufig.und ziemlich permekt gemacht sodass sich nur sehr schwer etwas beweisen laesst. Dabei werden auch geheimgehaltene Geisteskontrolltechniken ueber Strahlung eingesetzt. Das alles hat das Ziel die Belastungsfaehigkeit der einzelnen Person langfristig zu ueberfordern, dann die Persoenlichkeit der Person dann gewaltsam im Sinne des staatlichen Auftraggebers zu veraendern. Das ganze System wird auch als das System Kohl bezeichnet
Ein ehemaliger FBI Agent sagte zu mir. "After some time the victim can't take it anymore and breaks."
Dies geschieht in so ziemlich allen Mainsteamkontrollierten Laendern natuerlich auch in den USA. In China gibt es offene Verfolgung. Sarkosy hat eine Liste von Dissidenten aus China.
In Europa und in den USA ist die traditionelle Vergolgung durch das oben erwaehnte verdeckte System abgeloest worden da aber natuerlich noch andere Zielgruppen hat.
Herr Heuchelmeister Cohn-Bendit wie waere es damit????????
Ich wuerde der Fuehrung in China empfehlen auf keine politische Fuehrung des Westens zu hoeren wenn es um die Entwicklung ihres Landes geht. Menschenrechte, Freiheit sind sind sehr sehr wichtig.
Aber wenn politische Fuehrungskraefte eines westlichen Landes darueber sprechen dann ist das pure Heuchelei und dient politischen Interessen wie zum Beispiel Einfluss im Sinne des Westens zu gewinnen. China sollte sich an glaubwuerdigere Personen oder Organisationen wenden um sein Land und auch seine politische Kultur zu entwickeln. Dazu gehoert das man eine Kultur der politischen Auseinandersetzung entwickelt die die Dissidenten einschliesst. Dies kann China auch nicht vom Westen lernen, weil dort bestimmtes Denken verdeckt ausgegrenzt wird.
Cohn-Bendit zieht Nazi-Vergleich
http://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/olympia-in-china-cohn-bendit-zieht-nazi-vergleich_aid_323267.html
Die politische Linke in Deutschland ist geuebt im heucheln!
Deutschland hat ein ueber die ganze Republik verteiltes Netz von Personen die in kuerzester Zeit aktiviert werden koennen um eine ausgesuchte Person illegal zu schikanieren und illegal zu beschnueffeln. Es werden dann Ereignesse insziniert die wie zufaellig geschehen aussehen und die Betroffene Person permanent in Schwierigkeiten bringen. die Opfer sind normalerweise keine kriminellen die man anders nicht belangen kann. Der Terror geht permanent weiter wobei einzeln Ereignesse gar nicht so schlimm aussehen, aber sie sind haeufig.und ziemlich permekt gemacht sodass sich nur sehr schwer etwas beweisen laesst. Dabei werden auch geheimgehaltene Geisteskontrolltechniken ueber Strahlung eingesetzt. Das alles hat das Ziel die Belastungsfaehigkeit der einzelnen Person langfristig zu ueberfordern, dann die Persoenlichkeit der Person dann gewaltsam im Sinne des staatlichen Auftraggebers zu veraendern. Das ganze System wird auch als das System Kohl bezeichnet
Ein ehemaliger FBI Agent sagte zu mir. "After some time the victim can't take it anymore and breaks."
Dies geschieht in so ziemlich allen Mainsteamkontrollierten Laendern natuerlich auch in den USA. In China gibt es offene Verfolgung. Sarkosy hat eine Liste von Dissidenten aus China.
In Europa und in den USA ist die traditionelle Vergolgung durch das oben erwaehnte verdeckte System abgeloest worden da aber natuerlich noch andere Zielgruppen hat.
Herr Heuchelmeister Cohn-Bendit wie waere es damit????????
Ich wuerde der Fuehrung in China empfehlen auf keine politische Fuehrung des Westens zu hoeren wenn es um die Entwicklung ihres Landes geht. Menschenrechte, Freiheit sind sind sehr sehr wichtig.
Aber wenn politische Fuehrungskraefte eines westlichen Landes darueber sprechen dann ist das pure Heuchelei und dient politischen Interessen wie zum Beispiel Einfluss im Sinne des Westens zu gewinnen. China sollte sich an glaubwuerdigere Personen oder Organisationen wenden um sein Land und auch seine politische Kultur zu entwickeln. Dazu gehoert das man eine Kultur der politischen Auseinandersetzung entwickelt die die Dissidenten einschliesst. Dies kann China auch nicht vom Westen lernen, weil dort bestimmtes Denken verdeckt ausgegrenzt wird.
Sunday, August 3, 2008
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/NAB-will-shock-Wall-Street-GV4M7?OpenDocument&src=stf
The National Australia Bank's decision to write off 90 per cent of its US conduit loans will have dramatic repercussions around the world...
At the same time the US is waging war in two countries and Iran may be the next destiny. Instead of writing off loans, it should be possible to put pressure on the US government to take responsibility for the loans. They must have a lot of money when they are going to war abroad. Say they should give you the weapons they have, like military aircraft or else for the bad loans.
Further isn't it possible to recall other loans from the US stating they are not secure and only granting another ones for much much higher interest because of the risk with the US. They have now a record deficit there.
When this is done worldwide at best in an alliance the US could get financially in trouble and this can be used to try to dictate the US what to do in some areas.
It may be possible to press it for instance to finish wars, to a overhaul of their weak democracy and once and for all finishing the abuse of any technology.
But countries with loans could make their own wish list.
Finishing the abuse of technology could be done for instance by setting up strong independent control agencies which can go anywhere anytime to check. National security corporate interests must not a hindrance for them to investigate.
Why not trying to put pressure on the US.
The other way round it has been up to now many times.
The war in Iraq was against the world community. There were no means to stop it or they were not available.
It is also in the interest of the UN to get means against the US. Maybe it could head such a plan or propose other ones to make the US behave in the world community. I do not know if there are plans there but doing nothing would just look like being a accomplice with the current injustice, in the interest of American imperialism and weakening the UN in its original sense. It cannot be that sanctions or military actions are only turned against the weaker nations.
The National Australia Bank's decision to write off 90 per cent of its US conduit loans will have dramatic repercussions around the world...
At the same time the US is waging war in two countries and Iran may be the next destiny. Instead of writing off loans, it should be possible to put pressure on the US government to take responsibility for the loans. They must have a lot of money when they are going to war abroad. Say they should give you the weapons they have, like military aircraft or else for the bad loans.
Further isn't it possible to recall other loans from the US stating they are not secure and only granting another ones for much much higher interest because of the risk with the US. They have now a record deficit there.
When this is done worldwide at best in an alliance the US could get financially in trouble and this can be used to try to dictate the US what to do in some areas.
It may be possible to press it for instance to finish wars, to a overhaul of their weak democracy and once and for all finishing the abuse of any technology.
But countries with loans could make their own wish list.
Finishing the abuse of technology could be done for instance by setting up strong independent control agencies which can go anywhere anytime to check. National security corporate interests must not a hindrance for them to investigate.
Why not trying to put pressure on the US.
The other way round it has been up to now many times.
The war in Iraq was against the world community. There were no means to stop it or they were not available.
It is also in the interest of the UN to get means against the US. Maybe it could head such a plan or propose other ones to make the US behave in the world community. I do not know if there are plans there but doing nothing would just look like being a accomplice with the current injustice, in the interest of American imperialism and weakening the UN in its original sense. It cannot be that sanctions or military actions are only turned against the weaker nations.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Russia Can Become a Health Care Model for the World
http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/open_letters/open_letter_2008_02_28.html
Russia needs support and protection against the West. The non aligned movement had a goal here and could offer this. The NATO will try to use its several times higher military budget than that of Russia to develop a sufficient big military supremacy to Russia to make it follow its politics and the madness which is included there.
http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/open_letters/open_letter_2008_02_28.html
Russia needs support and protection against the West. The non aligned movement had a goal here and could offer this. The NATO will try to use its several times higher military budget than that of Russia to develop a sufficient big military supremacy to Russia to make it follow its politics and the madness which is included there.
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Monday, May 19, 2008
Article in the Pravda 20.05.08
Weapons that brought USSR down now aimed against USA
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/97151-0/It is spoken about the human rights weapon. To publicly criticize every offense against these to destabilize a system.
Would it not be a chance against the west to make public electronic weapons, Mind Control weapons, to discuss them in the public, how it should be. Then put them under control not only by law (how it is in Russia) but also to provide the public with knowledge to recognize their use, with knowledge how to protect against them and provide law enforcement with the equipment and specialists necessary to find people who commit crimes with such weapons.
To do this will give you a lot of credibility and brings the west at least considerably down in public recognition.
I am quite sure that this outweighs the advantages of possibly also abusing such weapons by far.
My thoughts to the Myanmar cyclone are. Maybe there was American influence at place. They have a long history of weather manipulation. This disaster maybe used to destabilize the regime in Rangoon. and establish one which is more desirable by the west.
To avoid this I think it would be useful to let foreign help in and not to risk that it enters violently. To choose from which country it can come could put the generals in Rangoon a it more at ease.(Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Russia... are countries which probably do not share this interest of overthrowing the government.) Help from there would be more unproblematic.
To avoid this I think it would be useful to let foreign help in and not to risk that it enters violently. To choose from which country it can come could put the generals in Rangoon a it more at ease.(Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Russia... are countries which probably do not share this interest of overthrowing the government.) Help from there would be more unproblematic.
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Friday, March 14, 2008
Mind manipulation machines becoming a reality for Militaries across the globe
http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/19213.asp
I say weapons which can do this are already in use large scale over the globe. I claim to be a victim of this and there are also webistes which lists victims who claim this too.
Many know about this crimes and rather enjoy it than help against it.
(i.e www.mindcontrolforums.com)
I notice that many people coming from the US have a similar radiation. This was not the case some years ago. Manipulation? The use of hidden technology?
An American who said he was a former FBI agent told me some years ago that governments all over the world enjoy the use of mindcontrol weapons, it would be hardly possible to escape.
Will the weapons then mainly be used to the benefit of the elite against minorities, like it seems to be partially now. These do not have the power to put something through in society. The majority can ignore such abuses like now as they are not affected.
When the technology gets more refined the threat of slavery for the people om the whole is huge. Who can prevent it? A traveling British university lecturer told me that in the UK about a million people were protesting against the Irak war. It was ignored. There are no means of might against governments when they decide to use the technology to enslave the people. Courts will not easily be able to help as lawyers can be intimidated i.e.
The war on terror has prepared governments against any violence from the people the surveillance is enormous. So who can resist if they go for the enslavement of the people.
Non government technology control which can go everywhere in a country at all times could be an idea. No place to hide for technologies, research also not under national security or any other secrecy. Regulation for this must be done outside of governments as governments are suspicious to rather abuse technology for its benefit than regulate it so that abuses cannot occur easily.
The above or other answer must be worked for now before it is too late, if not already.
http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/19213.asp
I say weapons which can do this are already in use large scale over the globe. I claim to be a victim of this and there are also webistes which lists victims who claim this too.
Many know about this crimes and rather enjoy it than help against it.
(i.e www.mindcontrolforums.com)
I notice that many people coming from the US have a similar radiation. This was not the case some years ago. Manipulation? The use of hidden technology?
An American who said he was a former FBI agent told me some years ago that governments all over the world enjoy the use of mindcontrol weapons, it would be hardly possible to escape.
Will the weapons then mainly be used to the benefit of the elite against minorities, like it seems to be partially now. These do not have the power to put something through in society. The majority can ignore such abuses like now as they are not affected.
When the technology gets more refined the threat of slavery for the people om the whole is huge. Who can prevent it? A traveling British university lecturer told me that in the UK about a million people were protesting against the Irak war. It was ignored. There are no means of might against governments when they decide to use the technology to enslave the people. Courts will not easily be able to help as lawyers can be intimidated i.e.
The war on terror has prepared governments against any violence from the people the surveillance is enormous. So who can resist if they go for the enslavement of the people.
Non government technology control which can go everywhere in a country at all times could be an idea. No place to hide for technologies, research also not under national security or any other secrecy. Regulation for this must be done outside of governments as governments are suspicious to rather abuse technology for its benefit than regulate it so that abuses cannot occur easily.
The above or other answer must be worked for now before it is too late, if not already.
Sunday, March 2, 2008
I am not that pleased about the prospect of an civil war in Afghanistan in the Russian proposal.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/124871.html
My Idea is to try to get an military operation together which works under Un command and provides an provisional order to Afghanistan and a peaceful platform to struggle for power for groups which are interested in getting it.
Finally this also means that this country would not be pressed into an western style country.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/124871.html
My Idea is to try to get an military operation together which works under Un command and provides an provisional order to Afghanistan and a peaceful platform to struggle for power for groups which are interested in getting it.
Finally this also means that this country would not be pressed into an western style country.
Obama, Clinton or Mc Cain are over before they begin.
To start to organize against American Imperialism which hides also inside the war on terrorism is a top task.
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,538744,00.html
to deal with Afgahnistan I agree rather with the Russian proposal, at least on the whole.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/124871.html
To start to organize against American Imperialism which hides also inside the war on terrorism is a top task.
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,538744,00.html
to deal with Afgahnistan I agree rather with the Russian proposal, at least on the whole.
http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/124871.html
Saturday, March 1, 2008
Looses wikipedia its authority? Is wikipedia going down the mainstream.
Is it like everywhere that the mainstream tries to get the top of everything under its control and as a consequence for instance former good information sources get hollow and empty?
You can buy a German wikipedia on DVD in many shops. But in the Germany version you possibly won't find so much ''undesired content'' than in that you should be able to download from www.sdict.com. The site is in Russia.
At least when I tried to download this wikipedia in Malaysia soon some technical staff was around. After some hours sitting in front of a computer in a internet shop in Batu Ferringhi I went to the toilet. When I went back the download was canceled.
I tried to download it again at other places but several times the connection was cut for a short time so the download was canceled. The site does not support resume. On other occasions the download just finished after a few hundred MBs and was by far not complete. In the forums of the www.sdict.com others reported the same problem
Is this an example how it is tried to decide for us which information we get to serve some hidden interest?
What is going on with wikipedia shows the following.
http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html
Is it like everywhere that the mainstream tries to get the top of everything under its control and as a consequence for instance former good information sources get hollow and empty?
You can buy a German wikipedia on DVD in many shops. But in the Germany version you possibly won't find so much ''undesired content'' than in that you should be able to download from www.sdict.com. The site is in Russia.
At least when I tried to download this wikipedia in Malaysia soon some technical staff was around. After some hours sitting in front of a computer in a internet shop in Batu Ferringhi I went to the toilet. When I went back the download was canceled.
I tried to download it again at other places but several times the connection was cut for a short time so the download was canceled. The site does not support resume. On other occasions the download just finished after a few hundred MBs and was by far not complete. In the forums of the www.sdict.com others reported the same problem
Is this an example how it is tried to decide for us which information we get to serve some hidden interest?
What is going on with wikipedia shows the following.
http://www.realityzone.com/currentperiod.html
GRIFFIN IS BACK IN WIKIPEDIA!
Last week my biographical listing in Wikipedia was deleted after being on line for about five years. The reason was that some of Wikipedia’s administrators do not like my view that there are hidden agendas in banking and government and they do not favor my advocacy of natural health without drugs. When I announced this in Unfiltered News, it triggered a wave of indignation that flooded the Internet and talk shows. Friends and supporters were angry that Wikipedia has no problem listing Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Dong, Al Capone, or even John D. Rockefeller’s father William Avery Rockefeller who, according to Wikipedia itself: “was a quack doctor and a confidence trickster;” yet, the editors found me to be so offensive that I had to be removed from the Internet lest my ideas contaminate the public mind. Then, on Friday afternoon, my listing suddenly was back, although drastically scrubbed to omit almost anything that might create a favorable impression. Gone is recognition of my participation on the Board of Directors of The National Health Federation and The International Association of Cancer Victors and Friends. There is no mention of The Audio Archives or my founding and leadership of The Cancer Cure Foundation, Freedom Force International, The Coalition for Visible Ballots, The Reality Zone, or Unfiltered News. Even my photo is gone. (Well, maybe that’s a good thing after all.) Of course, they were careful to let readers know that my works are “controversial” and that most doctors do not agree with my conclusions regarding cancer therapy. I have no objection to that because, basically, those are true statements, but I do object to their omitting the fact that there is massive support for my views and that there are several million readers of my works, which currently are published in five countries. All of that is true, also. Nevertheless, the bright side is that the outcry was sufficiently strong to at least cause my listing to be restored. That’s progress! Thank you for your support.
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Recently I thought about the Ron Paul campaign . It would be great if he could win but I know it from Germany and elsewhere that the mainstream usually gets their candidates through no matter how much chit they produce and observed that there are probably means which are used by powerful people in the country to influence the election to stay in a desired frame. So change happens not by election rather by approval of the powerful before any election. So I did not actually hope that much that he would win. But this attitude is hindering any possible success. I was impressed by Ron Paul and his supporters who relentless fight and fought for their goal and go on doing this.
Some years ago I started reading the anarchist internet news on www. infoshop.org.
I was disappointed about how much they actually were adapted to the mainstream. Despite this they had sometimes to fight for survival.
Once I had questions about them in my head. I answered by thinking that to support another political system or other ideas while law abiding must be possible in a democracy and elsewhere. Shortly afterwards on the website appeared the message."Kill capitalism before it kills you." It needed a long time to recover to a real opposition.
I often have incidents which prove for me that the intrusion in privacy is possible, that harassment, destruction and killing is possible and done by a well hidden sophisticated terror system that works in many countries of the world. Such a system is only possible with political forces which are not really serious about human rights, the Constitution.
Actually most candidates of the republicans and the democrats are not, while Ron Paul is.
With a vote for Ron Paul you defend the right to live your life and the right to be different, different from mainstream. With other candidates the danger of further regulation of life, of further tightening possible ways of further cutting freedom is probable.
You choose to support your individual future and not to be pressed and directed in shapes desired by the rich and powerful if you support Ron Paul.
With voting for Ron Paul you also support your health freedom and not to be delivered to health care which is actually care for the moneybags of Big Pharma.
He is the only one serious about this topic.
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/search/label/Dr%20Ron%20Paul%20-%20Health%20Freedom
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/health-freedom/
The mainstream uses for instance the blame to be an extremist if you deviate from their ideas or tends to label you sick. Anarchy is often associated with chaos, while it is meant as order without rule based on voluntary association. That is an example how political ideas deviating from the mainstream are discredited.
Psychiatry with its unscientific work and a on power based relationship between doctor and patient has enough possibilities to "'cure'' deviating views behind closed doors and for instance hiding in complicated therapy models.
Ron Paul supports a foreign policy of freedom. The American system is not the only political and economical system which should exist in the world. There should be many really different ones. When all is pressed in one shape (globalisation, New World Order) the world will loose many cultures and many possible ways to go.
When there is one system in the world from whom can you learn when you get in deep trouble. Who can help you if you go crazy? They are all the same all over the world, all crazy then.
There are also desires towards other ways of living, thinking also doing economics which will be suppressed by mainstream arrogance and should not be supported.
And if Ron Paul does not become the candidate of the republicans by campaigning he has the chance to make many Americans more familiar with libertarian ideas.
It won't be the last attempt to get such ideas through. The libertarian party is the third largest party in the US. People disappointed by the system could see them as a new chance to get some influence in their desired direction in America in the long run. To make politics for them personally more satisfactory could be possiblby starting to get active and to look where the small opportunities are. That also means to look at the own limited knowledge in politics and trying to increase it, that means to overcome frustration and look what have I to do with it, how political work could be part of your life or will I just improve my knowledge in this area. The libertarians could be political party and movement which is connected to projects in the country.
What about support founding a school, a university of economics which starts from libertarian ideas and sticks with them and has not capitalism as its background and goal from the beginning to look for new models and to get distance to capitalism which brings along to be able to find errors in it. (Capitalistic structures in a health system are an error for sure.)
What about trying to discuss libertarian ideas more regularly.
The Greens in Germany for instance were also party and movement some decades ago. It would be interesting to analyze why they failed and how such a movement could look in future.
To build your environment more to your desires and protect it against mainstream intrusion is important because you probably cannot hinder from happen if you do not do so. A German man who studied anarchy and publishes a anarchist newspaper has intrusions of capitalistic thinking in his brain. Being active politically and shaping your environment, being part of an movement can reduce intrusions and support your freedom, your dreams of a society which may go against the status quo. The danger to give up against a at least particular fanatic mainstream of getting part of it is huge as you are surrounded by its sources and its greed to get everyone and this has effect in the long run.
Some years ago I started reading the anarchist internet news on www. infoshop.org.
I was disappointed about how much they actually were adapted to the mainstream. Despite this they had sometimes to fight for survival.
Once I had questions about them in my head. I answered by thinking that to support another political system or other ideas while law abiding must be possible in a democracy and elsewhere. Shortly afterwards on the website appeared the message."Kill capitalism before it kills you." It needed a long time to recover to a real opposition.
I often have incidents which prove for me that the intrusion in privacy is possible, that harassment, destruction and killing is possible and done by a well hidden sophisticated terror system that works in many countries of the world. Such a system is only possible with political forces which are not really serious about human rights, the Constitution.
Actually most candidates of the republicans and the democrats are not, while Ron Paul is.
With a vote for Ron Paul you defend the right to live your life and the right to be different, different from mainstream. With other candidates the danger of further regulation of life, of further tightening possible ways of further cutting freedom is probable.
You choose to support your individual future and not to be pressed and directed in shapes desired by the rich and powerful if you support Ron Paul.
With voting for Ron Paul you also support your health freedom and not to be delivered to health care which is actually care for the moneybags of Big Pharma.
He is the only one serious about this topic.
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/search/label/Dr%20Ron%20Paul%20-%20Health%20Freedom
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/health-freedom/
The mainstream uses for instance the blame to be an extremist if you deviate from their ideas or tends to label you sick. Anarchy is often associated with chaos, while it is meant as order without rule based on voluntary association. That is an example how political ideas deviating from the mainstream are discredited.
Psychiatry with its unscientific work and a on power based relationship between doctor and patient has enough possibilities to "'cure'' deviating views behind closed doors and for instance hiding in complicated therapy models.
Ron Paul supports a foreign policy of freedom. The American system is not the only political and economical system which should exist in the world. There should be many really different ones. When all is pressed in one shape (globalisation, New World Order) the world will loose many cultures and many possible ways to go.
When there is one system in the world from whom can you learn when you get in deep trouble. Who can help you if you go crazy? They are all the same all over the world, all crazy then.
There are also desires towards other ways of living, thinking also doing economics which will be suppressed by mainstream arrogance and should not be supported.
And if Ron Paul does not become the candidate of the republicans by campaigning he has the chance to make many Americans more familiar with libertarian ideas.
It won't be the last attempt to get such ideas through. The libertarian party is the third largest party in the US. People disappointed by the system could see them as a new chance to get some influence in their desired direction in America in the long run. To make politics for them personally more satisfactory could be possiblby starting to get active and to look where the small opportunities are. That also means to look at the own limited knowledge in politics and trying to increase it, that means to overcome frustration and look what have I to do with it, how political work could be part of your life or will I just improve my knowledge in this area. The libertarians could be political party and movement which is connected to projects in the country.
What about support founding a school, a university of economics which starts from libertarian ideas and sticks with them and has not capitalism as its background and goal from the beginning to look for new models and to get distance to capitalism which brings along to be able to find errors in it. (Capitalistic structures in a health system are an error for sure.)
What about trying to discuss libertarian ideas more regularly.
The Greens in Germany for instance were also party and movement some decades ago. It would be interesting to analyze why they failed and how such a movement could look in future.
To build your environment more to your desires and protect it against mainstream intrusion is important because you probably cannot hinder from happen if you do not do so. A German man who studied anarchy and publishes a anarchist newspaper has intrusions of capitalistic thinking in his brain. Being active politically and shaping your environment, being part of an movement can reduce intrusions and support your freedom, your dreams of a society which may go against the status quo. The danger to give up against a at least particular fanatic mainstream of getting part of it is huge as you are surrounded by its sources and its greed to get everyone and this has effect in the long run.
Saturday, January 26, 2008
The human rights in the US seem to be just a farce but you can be sure that the officials will state otherwise.
http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/judges-dismiss-suit-seeking-damages-guantanamo-torture
add to this the surveillance, hidden government controlled gang stalking, electronic harassment and Mind Control operations, then you can say the human rights seem to be more a American advertising gag than reality. But it is not only in the US like this. US stupidities get globalised, that is one reason why much of the chit mentioned above you have at many places now.
http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/judges-dismiss-suit-seeking-damages-guantanamo-torture
add to this the surveillance, hidden government controlled gang stalking, electronic harassment and Mind Control operations, then you can say the human rights seem to be more a American advertising gag than reality. But it is not only in the US like this. US stupidities get globalised, that is one reason why much of the chit mentioned above you have at many places now.
The human rights in the US seem to be just a farce but you can be sure that the officials will state otherwise.
http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/judges-dismiss-suit-seeking-damages-guantanamo-torture
add to this the surveillance, hidden government controlled gangstalking, electronic harassment and Mind Control operations, then you can say the human rights seem to be more a American advertising gag than reality. But it is not only in the US like this. US stupidities get globalized, so much of the chit mentioned above you have at many places now.
http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/judges-dismiss-suit-seeking-damages-guantanamo-torture
add to this the surveillance, hidden government controlled gangstalking, electronic harassment and Mind Control operations, then you can say the human rights seem to be more a American advertising gag than reality. But it is not only in the US like this. US stupidities get globalized, so much of the chit mentioned above you have at many places now.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Mexico: Army and Paramilitaries Target Zapatista Stronghold
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=20080112075628582
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=20080112075628582
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Why Ron Paul
Freedom needs eternal vigilance. Freedom needs protection.
When a long time forces rule which not really support freedom they will remove it piece for piece often in a way many Americans are not even aware of. And this may actually be happening in America as well as for instance in Germany.
Look at that
http://www.newstarget.com/022465.html
....Harman's bill is called the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act. When HR 1955 becomes law, it will create a commission tasked with identifying extremist people, groups, and ideas....
....The "Extremist Beliefs Commission" is the mechanism for identifying Americans who pose "a threat to domestic security" and a threat of "homegrown terrorism" that "cannot be easily prevented through traditional federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts"....
The term extremism and trials to go against it can also be used as a means to reduce opposition to the agendas of the two leading parties by trying to label such people extremist if it is possible. It is so another political tool of suppression, because what democrats and republicans label extremist is not always extremist. It is just extremist in their view.
It is also a tool to suppress the views of minorities whose voices are not easily heard
Some years ago I read a report in a Asian country that most universities in America would be under the control of the democrats
How far this control goes I do not know but it may go that far that they also service them so that scientific reports are not really free they may be in favor of the controlling.
That may mean that when specialists are added to such committees they may be not unbiased.
Another example how the democrats deal with partners you find on the website of the greens.
To protect freedoms people should get elected who have been serious about this topic.
Candidates who speak about it but when you look up their actions you see they are not in favor of freedom will rather endanger it than support. The usual mainstream candidates are not really supporting freedom.
Ron Paul is serious about freedom. You can and should check this out.
Freedom is important. It is easier to protect it than to win it or win it back.
Once you have lost it you are delivered more and more to the arbitrariness of the ruling, which use this to their advantage against you.
Freedom needs eternal vigilance. Freedom needs protection.
When a long time forces rule which not really support freedom they will remove it piece for piece often in a way many Americans are not even aware of. And this may actually be happening in America as well as for instance in Germany.
Look at that
http://www.newstarget.com/022465.html
....Harman's bill is called the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act. When HR 1955 becomes law, it will create a commission tasked with identifying extremist people, groups, and ideas....
....The "Extremist Beliefs Commission" is the mechanism for identifying Americans who pose "a threat to domestic security" and a threat of "homegrown terrorism" that "cannot be easily prevented through traditional federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts"....
The term extremism and trials to go against it can also be used as a means to reduce opposition to the agendas of the two leading parties by trying to label such people extremist if it is possible. It is so another political tool of suppression, because what democrats and republicans label extremist is not always extremist. It is just extremist in their view.
It is also a tool to suppress the views of minorities whose voices are not easily heard
Some years ago I read a report in a Asian country that most universities in America would be under the control of the democrats
How far this control goes I do not know but it may go that far that they also service them so that scientific reports are not really free they may be in favor of the controlling.
That may mean that when specialists are added to such committees they may be not unbiased.
Another example how the democrats deal with partners you find on the website of the greens.
To protect freedoms people should get elected who have been serious about this topic.
Candidates who speak about it but when you look up their actions you see they are not in favor of freedom will rather endanger it than support. The usual mainstream candidates are not really supporting freedom.
Ron Paul is serious about freedom. You can and should check this out.
Freedom is important. It is easier to protect it than to win it or win it back.
Once you have lost it you are delivered more and more to the arbitrariness of the ruling, which use this to their advantage against you.
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
How american government hinders and may destroy small opposition papers and worses the possibilities of the poorer people in general. Such things seem to be American Standard the last time.
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2008postal-rates
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2008postal-rates
I read that the current agenda of president Bush is very unpopular and that the concervatives could not win the election with continuing it. They would need a new one. Well, Ron Paul offers one. One which could increase the chances of the conservatives in the election.
Could this be a reason to consider it more closely? You would have to change, but America would probably not be the first country which was imperialistic for a while and peaceful then.
Could this be a reason to consider it more closely? You would have to change, but America would probably not be the first country which was imperialistic for a while and peaceful then.
Tuesday, January 1, 2008
Ron Paul is the only candidate with some chance left who will not continue American imperialism.
The American people so decide also with their vote on who are the candidates of their parties already if America will be a peaceful member of the world community or continues to invade countries.
With this vote the people of America decide if they want to be a friend or an enemy of at least parts of the world. And the people around the word will know soon how the majority of the American people want their government to act.
The American people so decide also with their vote on who are the candidates of their parties already if America will be a peaceful member of the world community or continues to invade countries.
With this vote the people of America decide if they want to be a friend or an enemy of at least parts of the world. And the people around the word will know soon how the majority of the American people want their government to act.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)